Triple penalty in employment access: the roles of beauty, race, and sex
Submitted by admin on 27 November 2013 - 8:51pm
Available from:
October 2013
Topic:
Gender Economics
Labor
Year:
2013
We analyze the role of physical appearance, race, and sex at the earliest stage of the hiring process, by using a résumé audit study. We randomly assigned surnames and photographs to the 4,899 fictitious résumés sent in response to 1,247 job openings in Lima, Peru. Candidates who are beautiful, have a white-sounding surname, and are males receive more callbacks for interviews than their counterparts, thus imposing a triple penalty on homely-looking, indigenous, and female candidates. The magnitude of such penalty is particularly large in the case of physical appearance.
Go back to the Conference Menu Page
Research section:
Lacea 2013 annual meeting
